Did Clinton Gut the Military?

I’m kind of sick of hearing this from various sources, so I went to do some research into government-supplied budgetary data. I threw it into some Excel and ran some charts. Have a look for yourself. I plan on adding some more research there to investigate the various claims I hear from time to time.

One thing I did learn from this process is that budgeting and policy is pretty complex stuff. You might think that our leaders might have to back up their claims with better data than a simple dollar figure spent on National Defense. You might also think that a single number wouldn’t fully disclose changing natures of defense and military structure.

It happens to be that you don’t even need a single number to make a good sound bite. You can get away with a generalization, and as long as you repeat it long enough, those who hear it will believe.

3 Responses to “Did Clinton Gut the Military?”

  1. Alana Says:

    You should do an RSS feed for me to LJ. LJ appeals to my laziness… Bon

  2. Kevin Says:

    Interesting results on your research about military spending. It would be interesting to see the spending adjusted it as a function of per capita, and then maybe compare it to other western countries.

  3. Taegan Goddard's Political Wire Says:

    Did Clinton Gut the Military?

    Gordon Luk crunches the numbers and finds spending levels during the first Bush administration “remained relatively constant during the Clinton administration, despite the end of both the Gulf War and the Cold War in 1991. The ‘gutting of the military’…

Leave a Reply